Why Feminists are Against So Called White Privilege but not all Cases of Privilege. Is that "P
Hashtags and IG posts are becoming quite a powerful tool in the feminists tool kit these days as the evolution of social media marches on. Quick quips and snapshots of leftwingers holding signs claiming they need feminism because...
She needs feminism because of her perception of 10 year olds?
To make a long story short, the much adorned social media quip simply discourages any meaningful conversation and that indeed is by design. Sure there are comment sections where some conversation is had, but for the most part, the propaganda damage has already been done as the majority just see the image and continue thumb scrolling, letting the cultural narative build subconsciously.
So then the next question comes to the relative few thinkers or truth seekers out there. Why do they want to kill any meaningful conversation? If they have the truth on their side, then why try to force these parroted, unresearched, emotionally charged agendas down the public's throat?
And the Truth Shall Set you Free...
Let me start here with the end game in mind and work our way back from there. Bottom line and hardcore truth is that the feminists are leading a life both unfullfilled and unactualized and therefore the only way for them to prop up their crushed egos is to gain power over those who are on the path, or maybe at the destination, when it comes to self-actualizing. In other words, they hate well intentioned people who seek to improve their station and look to live in a just society mainly based on free trade and volunteerism.
Leaders of the feminist movement also maintain an appearance similar to the typical feminist
The feminazis are then easy pickings for the global elite as useful-idiot-pawns as the elite aim to trash any freedom loving, meritocratic alpha male that exists in their effort to erradicate opponents, both in the info-war and a potential civil war. It stands then that if feminists were truly concerned about privelege in the any meaningful sense of the word, they wouldn't just limit their focus to the white man. There is plenty of privilege to go around in this world that is blatently obvious and even to the half-wit an easy conclusion could be drawn as to its validity. To name a few (and here I use privilege as meaning some societal benefit conferred up an individual in which they didn't have to put forth any effort to receive):
Women with large breast along with favorable hip to waist ratio
Men with features such as height, square jaw, large penis, broad shoulders, etc.
Those who inherit a large sum of money
Those who inherit a family business or have family with strong political/economic ties
Women with other cleary distinquishable features such as glowing skin, bright big eyes, shiny hair (all of which indicate good health and child rearing capabilities)
The above examples clearly point to cases of privilege that go unaddressed by the third wave modern feminazi movement. What they are actually doing is attempting to make white men feel guilty regarding either a) things their ancestors may or may not have done (as if an ancestor who enslaves also means future generation benefit from that enactment) or b) a false notion that white men in particular are simply economically benefited by society today even though the facts say otherwise. And based upon significant amounts of anecdotal evidence, this guilt trip is working on the account that if you speak out and say the truth or something like "but I, personally, never enslaved anyone!" or "I personallyou might get a reaction that would have you thinking you are just about to be tarred and feathered.
If they actually cared about privilege, all cases would have to be considered, and they would have to remove the white anglo-saxon man from their crosshairs leaving windless sails in their search for power over those that have rejected them due to their low SMV. From now on dare I call feminist opporunistic ....."Privilege-ists?"
